Pending Appeals
Every final decision made by the Disciplinary Tribunal may be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
Last updated on 24 November 2020
- Bold, Italic Text identifies entries that have been added or updated on the date above.
Date of appeal | Appellant | Respondent | Nationality | Summary | Status |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/11/2020 | Christian Coleman | World Athletics | USA | The Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm a violation of Article 2.4 (Whereabouts Failures) | Appeal filed |
12/11/2020 | World Athletics | Salwa Eid Naser | BRN | The AIU challenged the Disciplinary Tribunal Decision of No Violation for Whereabouts Failures (Article 2.4) | Appeal filed |
09/11/2020 | Daniel Kinyua Wanjiru | World Athletics | KEN | The Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm a violation of Article 2.2 (Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) - ABP case | Appeal filed |
27/07/2020 | Aleksandr Shustov | World Athletics & RusAF | RUS | The Athlete challenged the CAS first instance decision to confirm a violation of Article 2.2 (Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) (Article 2.2) | Appeal filed. Pending hearing |
22/06/2020 | Gomathi Marimuthu | World Athletics | IND | The Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm violations of Article 2.1 and Article 2.2 (Presence/Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) | Appeal filed |
12/02/2020 | Trinidad and Tobago Olympic Committee | World Athletics | TTO | The TTOC (as NADO) challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm a violation of Article 2.4 (Whereabouts Failures) against the Athlete Ms Michelle Lee-Ahye | Awaiting Decision |
20/11/2019 | World Athletics | Jacob Kibet Chulyo Kendagor | KEN | The AIU challenged the Disciplinary Tribunal decision of No Violation for a Refusal to Submit to Sample Collection (Article 2.3) | Awaiting Decision |
22/02/2019 | Ivan Ukhov | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
22/02/2019 | Svetlana Shkolina | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
22/02/2019 | Ekaterina Galitskaia | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
22/02/2019 | Yuliya Kondakova | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
22/02/2019 | Lyukman Adams | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |