Pending Appeals
Every final decision made by the Disciplinary Tribunal may be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is the final disciplinary instance for cases arising under the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules and the World Athletics Integrity Code of Conduct.
This section of the site lists the appeals that are currently pending before CAS.
The list includes any appeals against a decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal as well as any appeals against national decisions or decisions of CAS sitting as a first instance tribunal that arose before the Disciplinary Tribunal commenced its operations.
The cases in this list will also appear on the list of First Instance Decisions. Cases will be removed from this list once an Appeal Decision has been rendered.
Last updated on 17 March 2020
- Bold, Italic Text identifies entries that have been added or updated on the date above.
| Date of appeal | Appellant | Respondent | Nationality | Summary | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/02/2020 | Trinidad and Tobago Olympic Committee | World Athletics | TTO | The TTOC (as NADO) challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm a violation of Article 2.4 (Whereabouts Failures) against the Athlete Ms Michelle Lee-Ahye | Appeal filed. Pending hearing |
| 20/11/2019 | World Athletics | Jacob Kibet Chulyo Kendagor | KEN | The AIU challenged the Disciplinary Tribunal decision of No Violation for a Refusal to Submit to Sample Collection (Article 2.3) | Appeal filed. Pending hearing |
| 13/06/2019 | Jarrion Lawson | IAAF | USA | The athlete challenged the violations confirmed at first instance, namely
Presence (Article 2.1) and Use of a Prohibited Substance (Article 2.2) (Trenbolone) | Appeal filed. Pending hearing |
| 13/06/2019 | Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez Romero | IAAF | MEX | The athlete challenged the violations confirmed at first instance, namely
Presence (Article 2.1) and Use of a Prohibited Substance (Article 2.2) (Trenbolone) | Awaiting Decision |
| 06/06/2019 | AIU (on behalf of IAAF) | QAF & Mousaab Balla | QAT | The AIU challenged the QAF decision of No Violation for Possession of a Prohibited Substance (Rule 32.2(f)) | Appeal upheld – 4 years ineligibility from 6 June 2019 (with credit for periods of Provisional Suspension from 11 October 2016 to 31 August 2018 and from 31 October 2018 until 6 June 2019) |
| 15/05/2019 | Asbel Kiprop | IAAF | KEN | The athlete challenged the violations confirmed at first instance, namely Presence (Article 2.1) and Use of a Prohibited Substance (Article 2.2) (EPO) | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
| 22/02/2019 | Ivan Ukhov | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
| 22/02/2019 | Svetlana Shkolina | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
| 22/02/2019 | Ekaterina Galitskaia | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
| 22/02/2019 | Yuliya Kondakova | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
| 22/02/2019 | Lyukman Adams | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
| 31/10/2018 | AIU (on behalf of IAAF) | QAF & Mousaab Bala | QAT | The AIU challenged the QAF decision of No Violation | Appeal filed, pending hearing |