Pending Appeals

Every final decision made by the Disciplinary Tribunal may be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

AIU-process-step4-1.png#asset:2559

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is the final disciplinary instance for cases arising under the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules and the World Athletics Integrity Code of Conduct.

This section of the site lists the appeals that are currently pending before CAS.

The list includes any appeals against a decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal as well as any appeals against national decisions or decisions of CAS sitting as a first instance tribunal that arose before the Disciplinary Tribunal commenced its operations. 

The cases in this list will also appear on the list of First Instance Decisions. Cases will be removed from this list once an Appeal Decision has been rendered.

Last updated on 18 March 2021

Bold, Italic Text identifies entries that have been added or updated on the date above.

Date of appealAppellantRespondentNationalitySummaryStatus
05/03/2021World AthleticsJoyce ChepkiruiKENThe AIU challenged the National Decision of No ADRV (Article 2.2)Appeal filed
20/11/2020Christian ColemanWorld AthleticsUSAThe Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm a violation of Article 2.4 (Whereabouts Failures)Awaiting Decision
12/11/2020World AthleticsSalwa Eid NaserBRNThe AIU challenged the Disciplinary Tribunal Decision of No Violation for Whereabouts Failures (Article 2.4)Pending hearing
09/11/2020  Daniel Kinyua WanjiruWorld AthleticsKENThe Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm a violation of Article 2.2 (Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) - ABP casePending hearing
21/08/2020El Mahjoub DazzaWorld AthleticsMARThe Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm violation of Article 2.2 (Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method)Awaiting Decision
27/07/2020Aleksandr ShustovWorld Athletics & RusAFRUSThe Athlete challenged the CAS first instance decision to confirm a violation of Article 2.2 (Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) (Article 2.2)Awaiting Decision
22/06/2020 Gomathi MarimuthuWorld AthleticsINDThe Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm violations of Article 2.1 and Article 2.2 (Presence/Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) Awaiting Decision
22/02/2019Ivan UkhovIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Awaiting Decision
22/02/2019Svetlana ShkolinaIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Pending hearing
22/02/2019Ekaterina GalitskaiaIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Awaiting Decision
22/02/2019Yuliya KondakovaIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Awaiting Decision
22/02/2019Lyukman AdamsIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Awaiting Decision