Pending Appeals
Every final decision made by the Disciplinary Tribunal may be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is the final disciplinary instance for cases arising under the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules and the World Athletics Integrity Code of Conduct.
This section of the site lists the appeals that are currently pending before CAS.
The list includes any appeals against a decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal as well as any appeals against national decisions or decisions of CAS sitting as a first instance tribunal that arose before the Disciplinary Tribunal commenced its operations.
The cases in this list will also appear on the list of First Instance Decisions. Cases will be removed from this list once an Appeal Decision has been rendered.
Last updated on 21 June 2019
- Bold, Italic Text identifies entries that have been added or updated on the date above.
| Date of appeal | Appellant | Respondent | Nationality | Summary | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13/06/2019 | Jarrion Lawson | IAAF | USA | The athlete challenged the violations confirmed at first instance, namely
Presence (Article 2.1) and Use of a Prohibited Substance (Article 2.2) (Trenbolone) | Appeal filed. Pending hearing |
| 13/06/2019 | Maria Guadalupe Gonzalez Romero | IAAF | MEX | The athlete challenged the violations confirmed at first instance, namely
Presence (Article 2.1) and Use of a Prohibited Substance (Article 2.2) (Trenbolone) | Appeal filed. Pending hearing |
| 06/06/2019 | AIU (on behalf of IAAF) | QAF & Mousaab Balla | QAT | AIU appealed the first instance decision of acquittal relating to the violation: Possession (Article 2.6). | Appeal upheld - violation confirmed 4 years ineligibility with credit for Provisional Suspension served (dates to be confirmed)
Awaiting Full Reasoned Decision. |
| 15/05/2019 | Asbel Kiprop | IAAF | KEN | The athlete challenged the violations confirmed at first instance, namely Presence (Article 2.1) and Use of a Prohibited Substance (Article 2.2) (EPO) | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
| 22/02/2019 | Ivan Ukhov | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
| 22/02/2019 | Svetlana Shkolina | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
| 22/02/2019 | Ekaterina Galitskaia | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
| 22/02/2019 | Yuliya Kondakova | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
| 22/02/2019 | Lyukman Adams | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Appeal filed, pending hearing |
| 31/10/2018 | AIU (on behalf of IAAF) | QAF & Mousaab Bala | QAT | The AIU challenged the QAF decision of No Violation | Appeal filed, pending hearing |