Pending Appeals

Every final decision made by the Disciplinary Tribunal may be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).

AIU-process-step4-1.png#asset:2559

The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is the final disciplinary instance for cases arising under the IAAF Anti-Doping Rules and the IAAF Integrity Code of Conduct.

This section of the site lists the appeals that are currently pending before CAS.

The list includes any appeals against a decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal as well as any appeals against national decisions or decisions of CAS sitting as a first instance tribunal that arose before the Disciplinary Tribunal commenced its operations. 

The cases in this list will also appear on the list of First Instance Decisions. Cases will be removed from this list once an Appeal Decision has been rendered.

Last updated on 13 June 2019

Note: Bold, Italic Text identifies entries that have been added or updated on the date above.

Date of appealAppellantRespondentNationalitySummaryStatus
06/06/2019AIU (on behalf of IAAF)QAF & Mousaab BallaQATAIU appealed  the first instance decision of acquittal relating to the violation: Possession (Article 2.6).Appeal upheld - violation confirmed  4 years ineligibility with credit for Provisional Suspension served (dates to be confirmed)
Awaiting Full Reasoned Decision.
15/05/2019Asbel KipropIAAFKENThe athlete challenged the violations confirmed at first instance, namely
Presence (Article 2.1) and Use of a Prohibited Substance (Article 2.2) (EPO)
Appeal filed, pending hearing
22/02/2019Ivan UkhovIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Appeal filed, pending hearing
22/02/2019Svetlana ShkolinaIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Appeal filed, pending hearing
22/02/2019Ekaterina GalitskaiaIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Appeal filed, pending hearing
22/02/2019Yuliya KondakovaIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Appeal filed, pending hearing
22/02/2019Lyukman AdamsIAAF & RusAFRUSThe athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely
Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence
Appeal filed, pending hearing
31/10/2018AIU (on behalf of IAAF)QAF & Mousaab BalaQATThe AIU challenged the QAF decision of No ViolationAppeal filed, pending hearing