Pending Appeals
Every final decision made by the Disciplinary Tribunal may be appealed to the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS).
The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is the final disciplinary instance for cases arising under the World Athletics Anti-Doping Rules and the World Athletics Integrity Code of Conduct.
This section of the site lists the appeals that are currently pending before CAS.
The list includes any appeals against a decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal as well as any appeals against national decisions or decisions of CAS sitting as a first instance tribunal that arose before the Disciplinary Tribunal commenced its operations.
The cases in this list will also appear on the list of First Instance Decisions. Cases will be removed from this list once an Appeal Decision has been rendered.
Last updated on 18 March 2021
- Bold, Italic Text identifies entries that have been added or updated on the date above.
| Date of appeal | Appellant | Respondent | Nationality | Summary | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 05/03/2021 | World Athletics | Joyce Chepkirui | KEN | The AIU challenged the National Decision of No ADRV (Article 2.2) | Appeal filed |
| 20/11/2020 | Christian Coleman | World Athletics | USA | The Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm a violation of Article 2.4 (Whereabouts Failures) | Awaiting Decision |
| 12/11/2020 | World Athletics | Salwa Eid Naser | BRN | The AIU challenged the Disciplinary Tribunal Decision of No Violation for Whereabouts Failures (Article 2.4) | Pending hearing |
| 09/11/2020 | Daniel Kinyua Wanjiru | World Athletics | KEN | The Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm a violation of Article 2.2 (Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) - ABP case | Pending hearing |
| 21/08/2020 | El Mahjoub Dazza | World Athletics | MAR | The Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm violation of Article 2.2 (Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) | Awaiting Decision |
| 27/07/2020 | Aleksandr Shustov | World Athletics & RusAF | RUS | The Athlete challenged the CAS first instance decision to confirm a violation of Article 2.2 (Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) (Article 2.2) | Awaiting Decision |
| 22/06/2020 | Gomathi Marimuthu | World Athletics | IND | The Athlete challenged the first instance decision of the Disciplinary Tribunal to confirm violations of Article 2.1 and Article 2.2 (Presence/Use of a Prohibited Substance/Method) | Awaiting Decision |
| 22/02/2019 | Ivan Ukhov | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
| 22/02/2019 | Svetlana Shkolina | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Pending hearing |
| 22/02/2019 | Ekaterina Galitskaia | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
| 22/02/2019 | Yuliya Kondakova | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |
| 22/02/2019 | Lyukman Adams | IAAF & RusAF | RUS | The athlete challenged the violation confirmed at first instance, namely Use of a Prohibited Substance /Method (Article 2.2) / McLaren Evidence | Awaiting Decision |